The term tracking
or ability grouping is a technique used by certain schools to classify and
group the students depending upon their levels of achievement or perceived
ability. In order to provide the students of a certain IQ level with suitable
instruction and curriculum, the students are placed in low, middle, or high
tracks. This practice was started during the 1930s. Over the decades, it has
gained a lot of controversy (Hyland). The tracking or ability grouping in
schools allows the teachers adequate distribution of time and attention across
tracks but is not a very good technique as it relies upon dubious levels of
achievement for the classification of students, deprives the week students of
the help of strong students, and promotes inequality among the students.
The pros of
tracking or ability grouping include uniformity of capability in all students
in a certain class. The teacher can expect the performance of students on the
basis of the track in which they have been placed. This makes everything more
predictable for the teacher so that he/she can make realistic and practicable
schedules. The teacher prepares the lecture as per the individualistic needs of
the students in a certain track. Usually, the students in high track take
lesser time to understand as compared to those in the low track. This makes it
possible for the school administration to spare right amount of time for the
right track of students. In such a system, the students particularly those who
are in the low track are advantaged in that they get more attention from the
teacher than what they would otherwise get.
The cons of
tracking or ability grouping include classification of students according to
their level of achievement which may not always give a fair estimate of a
student’s ability. There are certain students who are quite capable but are not
able to achieve very good grades because of certain factors like parental
divorce, or bullying in the school. The tracking or ability grouping system is
oblivious of such influencing factors. In addition to this, weak students in
the tracking or ability grouping system are not able to seek help of stronger
and more achieving students because the two are in different tracks following
different curriculums.
The tracking or
ability grouping promotes inequality. Students that are placed in the low track
tend to think low of themselves. They tend to believe that they are losers, and
cannot achieve much even if they try. On the other hand, students placed in the
high track are at risk of becoming over-confident, which in turn, may ruin
their performance.
Concluding,
tracking or ability grouping method of teaching is controversial. This method
of teaching is more favorable for the teachers as compared to the students in
that the teachers can make fair estimate of time and effort required by the
students of a certain track. However, this method of teaching increases
students’ risk of becoming under-confident or over-confident depending upon the
tracks in which they have been placed.
Works
Cited
Hyland, Meghann. “Ability Grouping
in Schools: Helpful or Harmful.” 1997. Web. 22
June 2012.
<http://www.wright-house.com/ac/papers97/Hyland-ac1.html>.
0 comments:
Post a Comment